GodŐs Laws and Principles
Although almost everyone thinks they understand this subject (and there are many contradictory opinions), it is surprising to see how few have made the effort to research what the Bible says, and to think the matter through thoroughly. So, what we will do here is examine what the Bible tells us about GodŐs laws and principles, starting from the beginning, and on through each era of the history of both men and GodŐs messengers (angels), to see whether Biblical principles do in fact supersede GodŐs Laws as some claim.
Although
the Bible tells us very little about the period before God created humans,
there are enough indicators available for us to draw some critical conclusions.
It appears to be true than in the very beginning, after God created His
heavenly sons, He had given them no laws. He was simply their Father and He
showed them the things that He wanted them to accomplish.
We draw
this conclusion from the fact that until the Slanderer rebelled and lied to
Adam and Eve, there was no mention of a law to condemn him or other heavenly
messengers to death. In fact, the first mention of a penalty for his (the
SlandererŐs) disobedience is found at Genesis 3:15, where the curse on the
snake (and the one behind its words) was cryptically foretold to be a Ôwatching
for its head.Ő
So, if
there were originally no laws from God, why hadnŐt He created them? He
obviously realized that His sons could choose to rebel, because He deliberately
created them each with the ability to choose for themselves whatever they
wished to do. But for the heavenly sons, both right and wrong and the results
of displeasing God must have been obvious. So, God didnŐt have to create the
possibility of a negative relationship by telling them what would happen should
they choose to disobey Him.
Then,
why did the Slanderer feel that he could openly defy God? Because, as the
results proved (where as Revelation 12:4 says, Ôa third of the stars of heavenŐ
were dragged to the earth), he knew that he had raised an issue that all living
creation in heaven and on earth was watching.
The
first law that we read of in the Bible is the simple one that was given to Adam
and Eve in the Paradise of Pleasure, when God told them not to eat of the tree
of knowledge of good and bad. And in this first instance, a penalty was spelled
out: Death to the offender.
What a
witness this simple rule must have provided to all of GodŐs heavenly creation.
It showed for the first time what GodŐs sentence would be for those who chose
to rebel against Him. And as such, it became a primary goal for the one who was
likely the first universal rebel, to have this rule broken. So, he set out to
challenge God by lying to the first humans; and he raised the question for all
living creatures of whether God has the right to expect their obedience and
love.
ItŐs
interesting that GodŐs law to Adam and Eve was so simple. Once again, no
negative thoughts of the possibility of murder, theft, rape, or any of the
hundreds of other human vices were mentioned. There was just the one command,
ÔThis is mine, donŐt touch it.Ő
When we
think of the worst crime that is possible for us to commit, we usually think of
murder. And as might be expected, the second sin mentioned in the Bible was
when Cain murdered his brother, Abel. Here, it is interesting to note that
GodŐs penalty on Cain wasnŐt death, but the curse of having to live a hard
life.
The
fact is; there was no law until then that forbade murder. There was just the
good example set by GodŐs love, and what we call ÔconscienceŐ or good sense, to
tell all intelligent living creatures what was right and wrong. Yet, as the
Bible tells us, murder and other human vices continued to increase to the point
that, as it says, ÔGod saw all the badness that men were doing on the earth was
increasing, and that the entire motivation of their hearts was always twisted
toward evil.Ő
So,
except for the righteous man Noah and his family, He destroyed all of humanity
and much of the animal kingdom.
After
Noah and his family left the chest (ark), God gave him some basic guidelines as
to what would happen to those who did extremely bad things. You canŐt really
call them laws, because He didnŐt tell men what not to do, He simply told them
what results to expect if they were guilty of wrong conduct. These guidelines
are often associated with the Sacred Agreement of the Rainbow. However, notice
that they preceded that Agreement, which was simply a one-sided promise by God.
HereŐs
what God said at Genesis 9:3-6, ÔAll living and
slithering animals can serve as meat for you. I have given them all to you as
though they were green vegetation. But you must not eat flesh with its blood of life.
Otherwise, I
will require your blood at the hand of all the wild animals. I will also
require a manŐs life at the hand of his human brothers. Whoever spills the blood of men will also
have their blood spilled, because I made man in the image of God.Ő
So,
there were just two evil actions that He said would provide bad results. They
were:
1.
The
blood of animals was not to be eaten (it was to be poured out as some sort of a
sacrifice to God), otherwise the violator would be liable to be killed by wild
animals
2.
Every
man who murdered another was liable to be killed by fellow humans.
Since
these instructions were given to the common forefather of all post-downpour
humans, they are obviously still valid, regardless of traditions, modern ideas,
and so-called Ôpolitically-correctŐ thinking.
And
while the ban on murder is quite well understood, the reason for the warning
against eating animal blood is particularly interesting. We want to remember
that in GodŐs instructions to Adam in the Paradise, and to Noah following the
downpour, the responsibility that was given to men was to ÔRule over the fish
of the seas, the winged creatures of the skies, all the herding animals of the
ground, all the slithering animals that crawl on the ground, and the whole
earth.Ő
Notice
that no mention was made in the beginning of men being allowed to kill and eat
the animals that were entrusted to their care. However, likely due to what had
become common practice prior to the downpour, God made allowances for men to
eat animals, as long as they poured the blood (which is described as the psyche or life) on the
ground.
So,
what conclusions may we reach from all the above? The evidence shows that;
contrary to common human thinking, Jehovah was never a God of laws and rules;
rather, these things were forced on Him by the inventiveness and badness of
human imagination.
One of
the most interesting stories to outline what human life and its goodness was
like before there were any laws from God on such matters, is the story of the actions
and thinking of JacobŐs son, Joseph. You likely remember what happened as he
served as a slave in the house of an Egyptian named Potiphar.
PotipharŐs
wife was attracted to Joseph and she tried to seduce him. Yet, Joseph resisted
and ran away. His thinking? He said, ÔWhy, my master doesnŐt even know what I
do around this house and he has put me in charge of everything . . . So, how
could I do such a bad thing and actually sin against God?Ő (Genesis 39:7-9).
Now in
this case, God apparently hadnŐt given a law forbidding illicit sex or
adultery. However, Joseph used his good sense of propriety in understanding
that having sex with another manŐs wife (especially his masterŐs) was wrong.
So, no law was required for a righteous man to make the right decision.
The
same was true of the righteous man Job. Again, before God provided any laws,
Job repeatedly spoke of things that he knew would be displeasing to God.
However,
because men really didnŐt understand all of GodŐs righteous ways, He did provide
an extensive list of laws to govern His nation Israel, after He delivered them
from bondage in Egypt. And the beginnings of these laws (all of which are
related from Exodus through Deuteronomy) are what we call the Ten Commandments,
which God Himself wrote first on stone tablets at Mt. Sinai.
But
what did this Law accomplish? Well, Paul explained it when he wrote (at Romans
3:19, 20): ÔNow, we know that everything the Law says was meant for those
who were under the LawÉ it stopped every mouth and made the whole world deserve
GodŐs punishment. So, no flesh will be called righteous before Him by
obeying the Law, since the Law is just the understanding of sin.Ő
Then he
wrote (at Romans 4:27, 28): ÔSo, where is our reason to brag? ItŐs gone! Does
it come from our doing the things of the Law? No, it comes through the Law of
Faith, because we believe that a man is called righteous due to his faith, so he
doesnŐt have to follow the Law.Ő
And at
Romans 5:20, 21: ÔNow, the Law came along so there would be many errors. And
where there are many errors, even more kindness can be shown. So; As sin has
ruled and brought death, [GodŐs] caring will rule in righteousness and bring
life in the age through Jesus the Anointed One, our Lord.Ő
Yet,
despite all that Paul wrote, many religious people today still think that they
will be declared righteous by following the Old Law and its Ten Commandments,
which they believe was given to all of mankind, not just to IsraelÉ but it
wasnŐt. The Ten Commandments were the first portions of GodŐs requirements for
His chosen people Israel if they wanted to receive His promise of becoming a blest nation
of kings and priests. And as Paul pointed out in his numerous letters, this
Law was impossible for imperfect humans to keepÉ however, the principles of
Gods thinking are all there as a guide (not a Law) to living a righteous life.
And
later on, during what we know as the ÔChristian EraŐ (as both Jesus and Paul
pointed out), God indicated that He didnŐt really want to give His servants lawsÉ
all He really wanted was for them to love Him and to love each other. For as
Paul wrote at Romans 13:10: ÔLove doesnŐt do bad things to oneŐs neighbor, so love is the
LawŐs fulfillment.Ő
Whenever
people wish to degrade the Bible, they point to the old laws and their
penalties, claiming them to be the product of a harsh and unloving God. Yet, if
you understand the purpose of these laws, youŐll see that they werenŐt really
harsh or oppressive, because nobody was really required to follow them, other
than those who freely chose to live in the land of Israel.
It was
GodŐs land and He gave it to the people who wanted to be part of His Sacred
Agreement. And all who wished to live in this sacred land (Israelites and
gentiles alike), since they claimed to be His people, were required to follow
the rules and laws that He set down for them. Then, to show that they were part
of this sacred relationship, He said that all males had to have the sign of
circumcision on their flesh, and He told them how to dress, groom themselves,
and how to act.
Realize
that the land had been set aside not just for Israel, but also for all who
wished to serve God. And any who didnŐt want to be part of this relationship
were free to go wherever they wished and dress and act as they wishedÉ the
story of the
prodigal son well illustrates this.
So, why
were such apparently minor infractions as breaking the Sabbath or entering
GodŐs Temple in an unclean condition punishable by death? Not because God
considered such things major sins, but because anyone who deliberately chose to
disobey Him and yet live in His sacred land had to be dealt with in a
deliberate way to maintain the cleanliness and sacred purpose of that land.
Probably
no period in time better illustrates GodŐs purposes and ways than the period of
the judges in Israel. For, although the people had GodŐs Law, there was no
government, as we know it, or civil administration in the land. All they had
was judges who were appointed by God to decide legal matters, and to take the
lead in war, when necessary. There were no politicians to make laws and no
policemen to enforce them; the people were just trusted to know right from
wrong. It was the Israelites who demanded a human king, along with all its
taxes, legislators, local laws, and the foibles of human rule.
As we
can see from all the above, although God was responsible for the first law (not
to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and bad), the making of laws arenŐt His
way. In fact, thatŐs why Jesus so strongly condemned the Pharisees; because in
their quest for self righteousness, they looked at the principles of what God
considered to be good and bad, and turned these principles into laws for
ÔrighteousŐ people to follow.
However,
as any personŐs good sense and conscience would tell them, there are in fact
things that people who love God just shouldnŐt do. Paul outlined them at 1
Corinthians 6:9,10, ÔDonŐt make any mistakes about this: Sexually immoral
people, idol worshipers, adulterers, gays, men who have sex with men, thieves,
greedy people, drunkards, insulters, and extortionists, wonŐt inherit GodŐs
Kingdom.Ő
Peter,
James, and John added to these instructions when laying out the guidelines for
Gentile converts to Christianity at Acts 21:25, where we read, ÔAs for the
gentile believers, weŐve already sent them our decision to stay free from
things that are sacrificed to idols, from blood, from what is strangled, and
from sexual immorality.Ő
Note
that this mention of blood and strangulation (where the blood isnŐt poured out)
reminds us that GodŐs instructions to Noah were still viewed as important by
early ChristiansÉ as were the other instructions against immorality and worship
of idols.
Principles
are the basis for GodŐs lawsÉ they are the reasons behind His laws. And if you
were to read the entire Law of Moses, you would have a much better
understanding of God thoughts on many matters. They are the guidelines we can
refer to in order to make wise decisions.
However,
it has often been said that principles are more important than laws, because
GodŐs laws for mankind have changed, depending on the circumstances, while His
principles remain the same. And though this is true, we must understand that
obedience to GodŐs laws is far more important than obedience to the principles.
For, whereas principles are general guidelines, His laws are the dividing
lines, and He has used His inspired servants to write them down in the Bible so
we would know the difference. Remember that laws are greater, because they are
also principles, but principles that God felt strongly enough about to turn
them into laws.
Now, in
the past, whenever someone felt that he or she could take Bible principles and
turn them into laws for others to follow, the Bible plainly shows that God
considers this a serious sin. The Pharisees, for example, were guilty of
turning principles into laws, and Jesus condemned them for doing it. And as you
read the Gospels, youŐll notice the many ways they did this in regard to
matters of tithing, washing, the Sabbath, the way they dressed, etc.
WhatŐs wrong with turning principles into laws? Well, the Pharisees made up rules that went well beyond the letter of the Law to make themselves look a bit more righteous to the common people. Yet, despite the fact that Jesus recognized the righteous principles behind their rules, he still condemned them as hypocrites. He didnŐt say ÔWell, they had good motivesŐ (as some have done today), because they didnŐt, and it was their self-righteousness that condemned themÉ as it condemns all who think they can add to GodŐs laws.
Yet,
through the years, super-righteous religious leaders have continued to follow
the lead of the Pharisees in creating their own laws of right and wrong, based
on Bible principles (which is obviously displeasing to God). We see such rules
being made in regard to recreation, the way we dress, the things we eat and
drink, in matters of bathing and washing, unhealthy habits (such as smoking),
in relations between husband and wife, and in innumerable other matters. And
yes, while good sense and manners should be everyoneŐs desire and suggestions
may be given, making religious rules about such things goes Ôbeyond the things
that are writtenŐ (1 Corinthians 4:6).
Recognize that GodŐs principles are all laid out in the Old Law. And if we turn these principles back into laws again, we are putting ourselves under the Old Sacred Agreement, which Paul showed time and again to be something that is unnecessary and wrong, for we are all under the New Sacred Agreement, which is based on love, not laws!
And if
there are those who still wish to argue that they have the right to set out
Bible principles as laws, consider the fact that God spoke of eating creatures
that live in the water which donŐt have fins or scales (such as catfish,
shrimp, oysters, lobster, scallops, crabs, etc.) as something disgusting
(at Leviticus 11:10). So, the principle is there.
Now, how important do they consider that principle? Why, the only other things
mentioned in the Old Law as being disgusting are homosexual behavior, adultery,
and incest (see Leviticus 18:22-30).
So, are
GodŐs laws the final word on the matter? No, for many stories in the Bible show
us how righteousness and good sense outweigh even GodŐs rules and laws. Take
for example, GodŐs instructions to the Israelites to destroy all the people in
the Promised Land. Yet, when the spies entered Jericho, they vowed to spare the
lives of a prostitute named RaHab and her entire family, because of her trust
in GodŐs power.
Then
later on, the Israelites unwitting made a peace agreement with the people of
the city of Gibeon, because they were fooled into doing it. Yet, the Israelites
honored that agreement and let those people live, because they had sworn to do
soÉ and this breaking of His Law was blessed by God.
As you
can see, Laws never come before righteousness. Rather, righteousness is the
purpose and basis of GodŐs laws.
So, His
instructions could be summed up as, ÔDonŐt do anything that is openly bad. Use
your consciences, and when in doubt, do whatever shows that you love God, your
fellow humans, and that you even respect the value of the lives of the animals
that you were created to rule over.Ő
For
more information, see the attached link, The New
Covenant.
To
return to the previous document, select the Back arrow on your browser